Commenting on the quality of much research that manages to get into print, often after multiple rejections, he quoted Drummond Rennie, deputy editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association who observed: There seems to be no study too fragmented, no hypothesis too trivial, no literature citation too biased or too egotistical, no design too warped, no methodology too bungled, no presentation of results too inaccurate, no analysis too self-serving, no argument too circular, no conclusions too trifling or too unjustified, and no grammar and syntax too offensive for a paper to end up in print. 199 There are numerous examples in the sphere of SNP research which come under the heading of How on earth did that get published?
How to increase the delivery of effective smoking cessation treatments in primary care settings: guidance for doctors, nurses, other health professionals and healthcare organisations 2009
Robert Hunt (13)
1, significant association between current rhinitis and serum cotinine levels was found when treating serum cotinine levels in tertiles (AOR = 0.99